Sourcing. Facts below were taken from each product's own public material, or from named news and institutional reports, and checked on 2 October 2026. Where a product does not publish something — pricing, corpus size, court coverage — this page says it is not published rather than estimating it. Nothing here is a benchmark, a ranking, or a test result. We have not run these tools against each other.
The one question that matters
Whatever you use, ask the same thing of it: where did this citation come from, and can I open it?
Pakistani law is thinly represented in the data that general AI models were trained on. That is why a general-purpose chatbot asked about a point of Pakistani law will often produce a citation that reads perfectly and does not exist — the right-looking reporter, a plausible year, a case that was never decided. The distinguishing feature of a serious legal research tool is not that it sounds confident; it is that every citation traces back to a document you can open. Judge each option below on that.
FAI Legal Research Assistant
What it is. An AI legal research assistant for Pakistani law, built by FAI Productions in Bahawalpur. It answers from an index rather than from model memory.
- Corpus: 19,771 statute sections across 240 acts and ordinances, and 188,602 reported judgments, and 23,343 court files mirrored from the courts' own records.
- Courts: Supreme Court of Pakistan, and the Lahore, Peshawar and Islamabad High Courts, plus the Federal Shariat Court. Full text of the Sindh and Balochistan High Courts is not yet included; their reported judgments are in the archive, which runs from 1947 onward.
- Pricing: Free plan, permanent, 10 questions a month. Paid plans from Rs. 990/month (Student) to Rs. 9,985/month (Chamber), all with PDF and Word export.
- Citations: marked verified only when the judgment was actually retrieved from the court source; unconfirmed ones are reported as unconfirmed.
Full figures are on the about page, and the head-to-head with the incumbent database is at FAI Legal vs Pakistan Law Site.
DigiLawyer
What it is. An AI legal platform for Pakistani practice, reported as developed by engineers from the University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore. It is described as offering two assistants: ARK AI, a research associate that answers with source citations, and MIKE AI, a drafting associate for pleadings, applications, replies, notices and contracts.
- Reported adoption: UET's announcement states it is in use by government institutions, the judiciary and law firms. The Sindh High Court Bar Association has separately announced introducing a "DIGI LAWYER" AI platform in collaboration with Codxperts Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
- Corpus: its own pages say 52 Pakistani legal journals and legislation from 1947, with Indian Supreme Court judgments on the higher plans. We could find no count of judgments or statutes and no per-court list on its public pages.
- Pricing: published, in credits. Free is Rs. 0 with 200 one-time credits (search only; its AI research, drafting and citation features are not included). Pro is Rs. 2,000 a month (1,000 credits), Max Rs. 5,000 (3,000 credits), Team Rs. 12,000 for three seats (9,000 shared credits). No registration fee.
- Citator: it offers "Cited In" and case-treatment tracking, which FAI does not.
- Self-reported: 20,000+ registered advocates; used by the Peshawar High Court, the Attorney General's Office and Sindh Police. We have not verified these.
- Drafting: a dedicated drafting assistant, MIKE AI. FAI also drafts court documents, from 70+ templates that an advocate settles and files.
Sources: UET announcement · Sindh High Court Bar Association · Minute Mirror · digilawyer.org/pricing, checked 2 October 2026. Note there is an unrelated Indian company also called DigiLawyer at digilawyer.ai; it serves Indian jurisdictions and is a different product.
Pakistan Law Site
What it is. The long-established subscription database of reported Pakistani case law. Not an AI product — it advertises no AI features — but it is what most of this market has actually been using.
- Coverage: its site lists ten reporters — PLD, SCMR, CLC, PCrLJ, PTD, PLC, CLD, YLR, MLD and GBLR — plus federal and provincial statutes and more than 1,200 essays and legal documents.
- Depth: substantially deeper reported case law than FAI, including the Sindh and Balochistan High Courts, Azad Kashmir, and service, labour and tax tribunals, going back to the 1940s.
- Pricing: Rs. 9,000 quarterly or Rs. 36,000 annually, each plus a Rs. 2,000 registration fee; USD $700/year international. No free tier advertised.
Source: pakistanlawsite.com, checked 2 October 2026.
Pakistan Case Law (pakistancaselaw.com)
What it is. A free, independent library of Pakistani judgments. It is a search and reading site, not an AI answer tool, and it is the strongest free option for finding a reported judgment by citation.
- Coverage: it states 232,594 judgments from 213 courts across 33 law reports, from 1970 onward, with every citation inside a judgment linked and a "Cited by" count on each case.
- Pricing: free, no account and no sign-up.
- AI: it advertises no AI-written answers, and no drafting. It lists an access route for AI tools (MCP).
- Where it is ahead of FAI: more judgments in full, free, with a citation graph. FAI adds the statute text, an answer that ties statute and precedent together, and drafting.
Source: pakistancaselaw.com, figures as stated on the site, checked 2 October 2026.
General chatbots — ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude
Excellent general tools, and the wrong instrument for a Pakistani citation. They answer from model memory unless they happen to search, they have no dedicated index of Pakistani statute or precedent, and they will not tell you which parts of an answer they could not verify. Used for structuring an argument you already understand, they are useful. Used to source a citation for a filing, they are the specific risk this whole category exists to remove.
This is not a claim that they are bad models. It is that retrieval beats memory for a jurisdiction with thin training coverage, and none of them retrieve Pakistani primary sources by default.
At a glance
| FAI Legal | DigiLawyer | Pakistan Law Site | Pakistan Case Law | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI answers | Yes | Yes (ARK AI) | None advertised | None advertised |
| Document drafting | Yes (70+ templates) | Yes (MIKE AI) | No | No |
| Corpus size published | Yes — 19,771 / 188,602 | Journals and years stated, no counts found | Not published | Yes, 232,594 judgments |
| Court coverage published | Yes, incl. gaps | No per-court list found | Reporters listed | Yes, 213 courts |
| Pricing published | Yes | Yes, Rs. 2,000 to 12,000/month | Yes | Free |
| Free access | 10 questions/month, permanent | 200 one-time credits, AI locked | None advertised | Fully free, no login |
The pattern in that table is the honest summary: this market does not publish much. If a tool will not tell you what is in its index or what it costs, that is a reasonable thing to ask its sales team before you rely on it in a filing.
How to test any of them in ten minutes
- Ask about a case you already know. Not a hard one — a familiar one. Then check every citation it returns against the official source.
- Ask for the text of a specific section — say, section 489-F PPC — and compare it word for word with the bare act. Paraphrase is a warning sign.
- Ask about a court it does not cover. A tool that admits the gap is more useful than one that improvises. FAI will say the full text of the Sindh and Balochistan High Courts is not yet in its index.
- Ask something with no good answer. Watch whether it says so.
Run those four tests on FAI for nothing
The Free plan is permanent — ten questions a month, no card, no time limit.
Corrections are welcome and acted on. If something on this page is wrong or out of date — particularly about a product that is not ours — write to support@failegal.site and it will be fixed or removed.